Joseph Saltiel joined Irwin IP in 2021 as a Senior Attorney. Joseph is an IP litigator with a long track record of successfully representing clients in courts across the country, USPTO, and the ITC. His practice focuses on IP litigation, counseling, and licensing. Joseph has substantial experience representing clients based outside the United States. His background is in the electrical and computer arts, but he has handled matters involving a variety of technologies and is skilled at quickly mastering new technologies.
Joseph is a registered patent attorney and prior to joining the Firm, Joseph served clients in law firms in Chicago. Prior to becoming a lawyer, he was a member of the technical staff at Bell Labs where he designed and wrote software relating to the telecommunications industry. Joseph is also an Adjunct Professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago School of Law where he teaches classes on both patent law and trade secrets.
Joseph received his J.D. from the University of Illinois College of Law. During law school, Joseph was the Internet Editor for the Law Review and the Journal of Law, Technology, and Policy. Joseph holds a master’s degree in electrical engineering and computer science from the University of Illinois at Chicago and a bachelor’s degree in computer science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Leading Lawyer (2020-present)
Illinois Super Lawyer (2024)
3-Time Recipient of Super Lawyers Rising Star – Intellectual Property Litigation
Joseph has assisted clients in a range of different matters, including, for example, the following:
University of Illinois College of Law, Urbana-Champaign J.D. (magna cum laude)
University of Illinois at Chicago M.S. Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign B.S. Computer Science
“Pleading Requirements for Patent Infringement” – October 2021
“The Impact of Alice” – IPPro Magazine (Nov 2019)
“Five years after Alice: five lessons learned from the treatmet of software patents in litigation” – WIPO Magazine (Aug 2019)
Speaker, “Seven Non-Alice Considerations for Software Patents” (2019)
“Three Indicators a Software Patent May Be Unenforceable” – Bloomberg (May 2019)
“7 Non-Alice Considerations for Software Patents” – Law360 (April 2019)
“The District Court Split on Pleading Indirect Infringement” – Law360 (May 2018)
“The 10 Biggest Litigation Mistakes That Companies Make” – Business.com (July 2018)
“Should You Get A Software Patent?” – Software Executive Magazine (Feb 2018)
“Understanding How the Courts View Software Patents” – ISV Insights (Nov 2017)
“Is It Time to Rethink eBay?” – Landslide Magazine (January 2017)
Moderator, “Protecting Intellectual Property”(2016)
Speaker, “Defend Trade Secrets Act and Updates on U.S. Patent Law” (2016)
Speaker, “Patent Reform and Updates on U.S. Patent Law” 2015
“Nothing Congress Has Proposed Will Help the PTO” – Law360 (April 2015)
“Patentability of Software Patents” – February 2015
“IP Issues in Software Application Development Agreements” – November 2014
“The Odds of Getting a Case Stayed Pending AIA Review” – Law360 (November 2014)
“What Happened to Patent Reform in the U.S.” – The Stellar Journal (Aug 2014)
Speaker, “Patent Trolls and Recent Updates in U.S. Patent Law” (2014)
“Overlooked Problems with Induced Infringement” – Law360 (Jul 2014)
“Divide and Rule” – Intellectual Property Magazine (Dec 2012)
“Will the ITC Become the Next Popular Forum for NPEs?” – Bloomberg (Oct. 4, 2010)
“Is there a better way to create privilege logs?” Bloomberg Law Reports (Jul 2010)
“Is Burying a Material Reference Inequitable Conduct?” Law360 (Jul 2010)
“Sans Agreement, Patent Exhaustion Still Matters” Law 360 (April 13, 2009)
“Who Owns the IP Rights to High School Sports” – ISBA IP Newsletter (July 2008)
A Bloody Competition Over Lizzie Borden’s Legacy, US Ghost Adventures, LLC v. Miss Lizzie’s Coffee LLC, No. 23-2000, 2024 WL 4799288 (1st Cir. Nov. 15, 2024)
The McFlurry is Not McBroken Anymore!, U.S. Copyright Office, Exemption to Prohibition on Circumvention of Copyright Protection Systems for Access Control Technologies, 89 Fed. Reg. 42 (Oct. 28, 2024)
Single Act, Not Sale, Triggers New York Personal Jurisdiction, American Girl, LLC v. Zembrka, No. 21-cv-1381 (2d Cir. September 17, 2024)
Double Trouble? Some Double Patenting Woes Resolved , Allergan USA v. MSN Laboratories Private Ltd., No. 2024-1061 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 13, 2024)
Money Talks: Trade Secret’s New Extraterritorial Reach , Motorola Sols., Inc. v. Hytera Commc’ns Corp. Ltd., No. 22-2370, 2024 WL 3268954 (7th Cir. July 2, 2024)
Are Hard Seltzers Considered Beer? The Jury is Still Out. , Cerveceria Modelo De México, et. al, v. Cb Brand Strategies, Llc, et. al, 2024 WL 1253593 (2d Cir. Mar. 25, 2024)
Show Me, Don’t Tell Me: Conclusory Allegations Not Enough to Stop Dismissal, Int’l Bus. Machines Corp. v. Zillow Grp., Inc., – F.4th – (Fed. Cir. 2024)
Seizure Orders Not Appealable, At Least For Trade Secrets, Janssen Prods. LP v. eVenus Pharm. Labs. Inc., Case No. 22-2426 (3d Cir. Oct. 17, 2023)
Obviousness-Type Double Patenting is Alive and Well , In re: Cellect, LLC, No. 2022-1293, 2023 WL 5519716 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 28, 2023)
Olé! CAFC Rules Patent Bullfight Must Go On , Inguran, LLC, et al v. ABS Global, Inc., et al (Fed. Circ. July 5, 2023)
Amended Complaint Gives Plaintiff a Do-Over, Not the Defendant, Power Probe Grp., Inc. v. Innova Electronics Corp., 21-cv-00332 (D. Nev. Apr. 27, 2023)
Infringers Beware: Copyright Damages Not Limited to Three Years, Nealy v. Warner Chappell Music, Inc., No. 21-13232 (11th Cir. 2023)
“Dream Syndicate” Attempts at Class Certification is Just a Dream, John Waite, et al. v. UMG Recordings Inc., et al., No. 19-cv-01091 (S.D.N.Y.)
Registering Trademarks Shows Secondary Meaning , SoClean, Inc. v. Sunset Healthcare Sols., Inc., No. 2021-2311 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 9, 2022)
Dangers of Relying on Exemplary Products, Arendi S.A.R.L. v. LG Elecs. Inc., No. 2021-1967 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 7, 2022)
Obvious Claim Error Does Not Excuse Willful Infringement, Pavo Sols. LLC v. Kingston Tech. Co., Inc., 2022 WL 1815050 (Fed. Cir. June 3, 2022)
District Court Split on Pleading Standards to be Resolved?, Sonos, Inc. v. Google LLC, 2022 WL 799367 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2022)
Sales Quote Invalidates Patent, Larry G. Junker v. Medical Components, Inc., et al. (Fed. Cir. 2021)
Artwork Based On Iconic Photo Is Not Fair Use, Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. Goldsmith, (2nd Cir. Aug. 24, 2021)
PTAB Still Constitutional, But A Weakness Emerges, Mobility Workx, LLC v. Unified Pats., 2021 WL 4762265 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 13, 2021)
Artificial Intelligence Cannot Be An Inventor. At Least, Not Yet., Thaler v. Hirshfeld, 2021 WL 3934803 (E.D. Va. 2021)
Federal Circuit Cracks Down on PTAB Twice in One Week for Blindsiding Patent Owners, Oren Tech., LLC, v. Proppant Express Inv. LLC, 2019-1778 (Fed. Cir. July 23, 2021) Qualcomm Inc. v. Intel Corp., 2020-1589 (Fed. Cir. July 27, 2021)
150 N Wacker Drive Suite 700
Chicago, IL 60606
(312) 667-6080
© 2024 Irwin IP LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Attorney Advertising. The material and information contained on these pages and on any pages linked from these pages are intended to provide general information only and not legal advice. You should consult with an attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction before relying upon any of the information presented here. The acts of sending email to any email addresses listed on this website or viewing information from this website do not create an attorney-client relationship. The listing of verdicts, settlements, and other case results is not a guarantee or prediction of the outcome of any other claims.
We use cookies to optimize site functionality and give you the best possible experience. By using this site, you agree to allow the use of cookies for analysis of site traffic and advertising purposes. Cookie Policy