Jason Keener joined Irwin IP in 2022 and was elevated in 2023 to partner as part of the initial partnership class. Jason has over 18 years of experience in intellectual property litigation involving patent, copyright, trademarks, and trade secret disputes in the areas of automotive, software, internet, and technology. He regularly represents clients seeking to enforce or monetize their intellectual property assets as well as defending clients against claims of infringement asserted by both competitors and non-practicing entities. Jason assists clients in resolving intellectual property disputes with a focus on the business goals of the client. Often this involves pre-litigation or early resolution of the dispute. However, where necessary, Jason leads the case through trial and any appeal, which he has successfully done for numerous clients. He ensures that his clients are represented by a lean but scalable team of litigators and technical support that avoids the inefficient use of his client’s resources.
Innovative solutions are an integral part of Jason’s litigation philosophy. As part of that philosophy, Jason not only looks for opportunities to push intellectual property law in novel ways but also presents clients with alternative billing arrangements that allow for a measure of certainty or predictability of often unpredictable litigation costs.
Prior to joining Irwin IP, Jason was a partner at Foley & Lardner LLP, a partner and chair of the IP department at Fox Swibel Levin & Carroll, and a senior associate at Clark Hill, PLC.
Best Lawyers (2023-Present)
U.S. District Ct., N.D. of Illinois
U.S. District Ct., C.D. of Illinois
U.S. District Ct., E.D. of Michigan
U.S. District Ct., E.D. of Tennessee
U.S. District Ct., E.D. of Texas
U.S. District Ct., E.D. of Wisconsin
U.S. District Ct., W.D. of Wisconsin
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
University of Wisconsin Law School, J.D. 2003, Order of the Coif (summa cum laude); Law Review
University of Wisconsin B.S Computer Science and Political Science, 2000, with Distinction
Illinois
Best Lawyers (2023)
Be Careful What You Admit to During Oral Argument, Google v. Hammond Dev. Int’l, Inc., 2022 WL 17491972 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 8, 2022)
CAFC Trims the Fat from Meat Slicer Patent Dispute: Additional Evidence on Reply Was Permissible in IPR, Provisur Technologies, Inc. v. Weber, Inc. (Federal Circuit 2022)
States Cannot Force Publishers to License Public Libraries, Ass’n of Am. Publishers v. Frosh, No. DLB-21-3133 (D. Md. Jun. 13, 2022)
Again, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act Likely Does Not Protected “Ungated” Date, 9th Circuit, HiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corp., Case No. 17-16783 (9th Cir. Apr. 18, 2022)
Implications of Remote Working on Proper Venue: Covid-19 Does Not Change the rules, but Can Cause Improper Venue, GreatGigz Sol., LLC v. ZipRecruiter, Inc., 21-CV-00172 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 11, 2022)
150 N Wacker Drive Suite 700
Chicago, IL 60606
(312) 667-6080
© 2024 Irwin IP LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Attorney Advertising. The material and information contained on these pages and on any pages linked from these pages are intended to provide general information only and not legal advice. You should consult with an attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction before relying upon any of the information presented here. The acts of sending email to any email addresses listed on this website or viewing information from this website do not create an attorney-client relationship. The listing of verdicts, settlements, and other case results is not a guarantee or prediction of the outcome of any other claims.
We use cookies to optimize site functionality and give you the best possible experience. By using this site, you agree to allow the use of cookies for analysis of site traffic and advertising purposes. Cookie Policy