In an opinion by Justice Kagan, the Supreme Court recently held that the Copyright Remedy Clarification Act of 1990 (“CRCA”) did not validly abrogate States’ sovereign immunity for copyright infringement.[1] The Supreme Court relied on its 1999 decision in Florida Prepaid;[2]which held that Congress could not use its powers under
On September 5, 2018, Heineken filed a complaint with the International Trade Commission against Anheuser-Busch alleging a violation of § 337 of the Tariff Act, in the importation into or sale in the United States of beverage dispensing systems and components that allegedly infringed claims 1–11 of Heineken U.S. Patent
On March 9, 2020, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, en banc, affirmed the district court’s judgment of noninfringement of copyright in favor of Led Zeppelin and, notably, joined the majority of circuits by overruling the “inverse ratio rule” for copyright infringement in its jurisdiction and further found
Cleantech Corp. (“CleanTech”), the owner of four patents directed to recovering oil from an ethanol plant’s byproduct, began filing infringement actions against numerous defendants around the country beginning in 2009. After the disparate actions were combined by the multidistrict litigation panel, the defendants moved for summary judgment on invalidity of
The Federal Circuit held that a server owned by Google, Inc. that was installed in a third-party contractor’s datacenter did not constitute a “regular and established place of business” under the patent venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) because none of Google’s employees did business at the site. In re:
The Federal Circuit recently vacated an order granting summary judgment of non-infringement on the grounds that a settlement agreement executed shortly before the order mooted the case. The Federal Circuit concluded that continuing obligations of the parties, as set forth in the settlement agreement, did not preclude this result.[1] In
The Seventh Circuit held that internet sales of products with allegedly infringing branding from a national advertising company will establish personal jurisdiction in Illinois under the Illinois long-arm statute. In trademark infringement cases, unlike patent cases, even a seemingly small number of allegedly infringing sales can be sufficient to establish
The Federal Circuit recently ruled the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the PTAB”) may not cancel claims for indefiniteness in an inter partes review (“IPR”) proceeding.[1] The Federal Circuit concluded while an IPR petition defines the scope of an IPR proceeding, the Board may not exceed its governing statutory provisions
After finding that a user manual was publicly accessible (and thus a printed publication), a panel of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) relied on a combination of the teachings in that user manual and the knowledge of a person of ordinary skill in the art (“POSA”) to invalidate
On two issues of first impression, the Fifth Circuit held that mitigation was not an absolute defense to statutory damages under the Copyright Act, and not a complete defense to Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) statutory damages. Oil Daily is a newsletter published by Plaintiff EIG; it analyzes the North
© 2021 Irwin IP LLC. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer | Sitemap | Cookie Policy
Attorney Advertising. The material and information contained on these pages and on any pages linked from these pages are intended to provide general information only and not legal advice. You should consult with an attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction before relying upon any of the information presented here. The acts of sending email to this website or viewing information from this website do not create an attorney-client relationship. The listing of verdicts, settlements, and other case results is not a guarantee or prediction of the outcome of any other claims.