Excellence. Integrity. Success.

“Irwin IP provides all the assets and expertise of one of the world’s largest and most sophisticated IP litigation firms at a much more affordable cost, and then they combine that with deep strategic thinking, practicality, and a client-first approach. They are my go-to IP litigation counsel without regard to size or complexity of the matter.”

“I highly recommend Barry, Reid and team if you have a bet the company intellectual property litigation. You can count on them to prepare thorough briefs quickly and efficiently.”

"Working with Barry, Ifti, and the rest of the team has been absolutely fantastic. They have demonstrated their ability to be creative and effective at handling both offensive and defense litigation tactics, with a work ethic that is second to none."

"The excellent team at Irwin IP including Adam Reis and Barry Irwin has helped my company during critical times within such as scaling, contracts, negotiations and defending my contracts. Being in a creative field, I need attorney's that understand the law within the creative and entertainment fields and Irwin has always exceeded my expectations and helped me grow my business with their proper legal counsel."

"It has been an absolute pleasure to work with Irwin IP. For my company’s contract negotiations, there’s no one I would trust more than Barry. His vigilance meant that those same contracts would be promptly enforced if needed. When it comes to intellectual property, his team will stand up for you - no matter if the opponent is a small studio or a giant corporation. He is fearless in his pursuits on your behalf."

Irwin IP Case Of The Week

USPTO May Not Collect Attorney Fees in § 145 Actions to Issue a Patent

Peter v. NantKwest, Case No. 18-801, 589 U.S. --- (Supreme Court 2019)

Emily Sample & Reid Huefner

December 16, 2019

Professor Dennis Crouch did a great job of summarizing the Supreme Court’s ruling last week in Peter v. NantKwest, wherein the Court found that the Patent and Trademark Office could not shift its litigation costs to applicants who choose to challenge the PTO’s decisions in district court. We recommend everyone read his summary, posted on the Patently-O Blog, here.

Download PDF

Recent Posts

Special Patent Rights, but Only for Inventors

A new proposed legislation relating to the patent laws has been submitted in the United States House of Representatives—the Inventor Rights Act of 2019. The

PTAB Finds RPX Member Google is not Real Party in Interest or Privy

In what amounts to the next in a long line of cases addressing the subject, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued an opinion again

When “Fight Hard” Pays Off

The Federal Circuit recently affirmed an award of attorney’s fees for a patent infringement defendant where, as part of its ‘exceptional case’ analysis under 35

222 South Riverside Plaza Suite 2350
Chicago, IL 60606
312.667.6080

Attorney Advertising. The material and information contained on these pages and on any pages linked from these pages are intended to provide general information only and not legal advice. You should consult with an attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction before relying upon any of the information presented here. The acts of sending email to this website or viewing information from this website do not create an attorney-client relationship. The listing of verdicts, settlements, and other case results is not a guarantee or prediction of the outcome of any other claims.